Adaptive diversity and misbelief

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):516 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Although it makes some progress, McKay & Dennett's (M&D's) proposal is limited because (1) the argument for adaptive misbelief is not new, (2) arguments overextend the evidence provided, and (3) the alleged sufficient conditions are not as prohibitive as suggested. We offer alternative perspectives and evidence, including individual differences research, indicating that adaptive misbeliefs are likely much more widespread than implied.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COKADA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-12-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Trouble with Overconfidence.Moore, Don A. & Healy, Paul J.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Heuristics and Life-Sustaining Treatments.Feltz, Adam & Samayoa, Stephanie

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-08-31

Total views
174 ( #15,033 of 37,985 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #18,752 of 37,985 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.