Autonomy-minded Anti-perfectionism: Novel, Intuitive, and Sound

Journal of Philosophical Research 37:233-241 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Patrick Rudisill purports to identify various problems with my argument that the state promotion of autonomy is consistent with anti-perfectionism, viz., that it falsely pretends to be novel, is unacceptably counterintuitive because too restrictive and too permissive, and that it deploys a self-defeating formal apparatus. I argue, in reply, that my argument is more novel than Rudisill gives me credit for; that properly understood my anti-perfectionism implies neither the implausible restrictions nor the unpalatable permissions that Rudisill claims; and that my formal apparatus is innocent of the flaws imputed to it.

Author's Profile

Ben Colburn
University of Glasgow

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
121 (#54,065)

6 months
16 (#57,261)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?