Autonomy-minded Anti-perfectionism: Novel, Intuitive, and Sound

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
John Patrick Rudisill purports to identify various problems with my argument that the state promotion of autonomy is consistent with anti-perfectionism, viz., that it falsely pretends to be novel, is unacceptably counterintuitive because too restrictive and too permissive, and that it deploys a self-defeating formal apparatus. I argue, in reply, that my argument is more novel than Rudisill gives me credit for; that properly understood my anti-perfectionism implies neither the implausible restrictions nor the unpalatable permissions that Rudisill claims; and that my formal apparatus is innocent of the flaws imputed to it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-10-20
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
75 ( #43,594 of 57,074 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #44,961 of 57,074 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.