Assessing the Resurrection Hypothesis: Problems with Craig's Inference to the Best Explanation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The hypothesis that God supernaturally raised Jesus from the dead is argued by William Lane Craig to be the best explanation for the empty tomb and postmortem appearances of Jesus because it satisfies seven criteria of adequacy better than rival naturalistic hypotheses. We identify problems with Craig’s criteria-based approach and show, most significantly, that the Resurrection hypothesis fails to fulfill any but the first of his criteria—especially explanatory scope and plausibility.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COLATR-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Justifying Historical Descriptions.McCullagh, Christopher Behan

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-06-21

Total views
527 ( #7,631 of 50,269 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
250 ( #1,440 of 50,269 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.