Forbidden ways of life

Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):618-629 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I examine an objection against autonomy-minded liberalism sometimes made by philosophers such as John Rawls and William Galston, that it rules out ways of life which do not themselves value freedom or autonomy. This objection is incorrect, because one need not value autonomy in order to live an autonomous life. Hence autonomy-minded liberalism need not rule out such ways of life. I suggest a modified objection which does work, namely that autonomy-minded liberalism must rule out ways of life that could not develop under an autonomy-promoting education. I conclude by suggesting some reasons why autonomy-minded liberals should bite the bullet and accept this
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COLFWO
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-10-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
110 ( #37,291 of 57,075 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #55,106 of 57,075 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.