Responsibility and School Choice in Education

Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (2):207-222 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Consider the following argument for school choice, based on an appeal to the virtues of the market: allowing parents some measure of choice over their particular children's education ultimately serves the interests of all children, because creating a market mechanism in state education will produce improvements through the same pressures that lead to greater efficiency and quality when markets are deployed in more familiar contexts. The argument fails, because it is committed to a principle of equal concern, which implies that a market in education is acceptable only if it is right to hold children disadvantaged by their parents' poor market choices substantively responsible for the fact. Since that claim is untenable, the marketā€based argument for school choice not only fails, but also turns out to rely on principles which in fact condemn the very policy it was supposed to support.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COLRAS
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What We Owe to Each Other.Scanlon, Thomas M.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-03-23

Total views
68 ( #32,578 of 43,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #37,261 of 43,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.