Perceptual reasons

Philosophical Studies 173 (4):991-1006 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The two main theories of perceptual reasons in contemporary epistemology can be called Phenomenalism and Factualism. According to Phenomenalism, perceptual reasons are facts about experiences conceived of as phenomenal states, i.e., states individuated by phenomenal character, by what it’s like to be in them. According to Factualism, perceptual reasons are instead facts about the external objects perceived. The main problem with Factualism is that it struggles with bad cases: cases where perceived objects are not what they appear or where there is no perceived object at all. The main problem with Phenomenalism is that it struggles with good cases: cases where everything is perfectly normal and the external object is correctly perceived, so that one’s perceptual beliefs are knowledge. In this paper we show that there is a theory of perceptual reasons that avoids the problems for Factualism and Phenomenalism. We call this view Propositionalism. We use ‘proposition’ broadly to mean the entities that are contents of beliefs and other doxastic attitudes. The key to finding a middle ground between Phenomenalism and Factualism, we claim, is to allow our reasons to be false in bad cases. Despite being false, they are about the external world, not our phenomenal states
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COMPR
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What We Owe to Each Other.Scanlon, Thomas M.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-23

Total views
216 ( #17,910 of 45,694 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #18,981 of 45,694 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.