Review of: Hodesdon, K. “Mathematica representation: playing a role”. Philosophical Studies (2014) 168:769–782. Mathematical Reviews. MR 3176431.

MATHEMATICAL REVIEWS 2015:3176431 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This 4-page review-essay—which is entirely reportorial and philosophically neutral as are my other contributions to MATHEMATICAL REVIEWS—starts with a short introduction to the philosophy known as mathematical structuralism. The history of structuralism traces back to George Boole (1815–1864). By reference to a recent article various feature of structuralism are discussed with special attention to ambiguity and other terminological issues. The review-essay includes a description of the recent article. The article’s 4-sentence summary is quoted in full and then analyzed. The point of the quotation is to make clear how murky, incompetent, and badly written the paper is. There is no way to determine from the article whether the editor or referees suggests improvements.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CORROH
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-03-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-03-21

Total views
141 ( #29,300 of 52,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #26,378 of 52,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.