Disaster and Debate

Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (5):516-544 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Faced with a national tragedy, citizens respond in different ways. Some will initiate debate about the possible connections between this tragedy and broader moral and political issues. But others often complain that this is too early, that it is inappropriate to debate such larger issues while ‘the bodies are still warm’. This paper critically examines the grounds for such a complaint. We consider different interpretations of the complaint—cynical, epistemic and ethical—and argue that it can be resisted on all of these readings. Debate shortly after a national disaster is therefore permissible. We then set out a political argument in favour of early debate based on the value of broad political participation in liberal democracies and sketch a stronger argument, based on the duty to support just institutions, that would support a political duty to engage in debate shortly after tragedies have occurred.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COUDAD-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-01-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-01-11

Total views
134 ( #31,589 of 54,384 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #14,771 of 54,384 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.