Disaster and Debate

Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (5):516-544 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Faced with a national tragedy, citizens respond in different ways. Some will initiate debate about the possible connections between this tragedy and broader moral and political issues. But others often complain that this is too early, that it is inappropriate to debate such larger issues while ‘the bodies are still warm’. This paper critically examines the grounds for such a complaint. We consider different interpretations of the complaint—cynical, epistemic and ethical—and argue that it can be resisted on all of these readings. Debate shortly after a national disaster is therefore permissible. We then set out a political argument in favour of early debate based on the value of broad political participation in liberal democracies and sketch a stronger argument, based on the duty to support just institutions, that would support a political duty to engage in debate shortly after tragedies have occurred.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COUDAD-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-01-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-11

Total downloads
37 ( #29,168 of 35,802 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #32,545 of 35,802 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.