Side-Effect effect without side effects: The pervasive impact of moral considerations on judgments of intentionality

Philosophical Psychology 25 (6):837-854 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Studying the folk concept of intentional action, Knobe (2003a) discovered a puzzling asymmetry: most people consider some bad side effects as intentional while they consider some good side effects as unintentional. In this study, we extend these findings with new experiments. The first experiment shows that the very same effect can be found in ascriptions of intentionality in the case of means for action. The second and third experiments show that means are nevertheless generally judged more intentional than side effects, and that people do take into account the structure of the action when ascribing intentionality. We then discuss a number of hypotheses that can account for these data, using reactions times from our first experiment
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COVSEW
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-07-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment.Cushman, Fiery; Young, Liane & Hauser, Marc

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-07-04

Total downloads
572 ( #3,480 of 37,169 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #10,513 of 37,169 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.