What makes a response to schoolroom wrongs permissible?

Theory and Research in Education 18 (1):23-39 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Howard’s moral fortification theory of criminal punishment lends itself to justifying correction for children in schools that is supportive. There are good reasons to include other students in the learning opportunity occasioned by doing right in response to wrong, which need not exploit the wrongdoing student as a mere means. Care ethics can facilitate restorative and problem-solving approaches to correction. However, there are overriding reasons against doing so when this stigmatises the wrongdoing student, since this inhibits their learning. Responses that avoidably stigmatise students impermissibly undermine both the developmental ethos of education, and students’ recognition and respect for each other as equals.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COVWMA
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-09-17
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-04-09

Total views
7 ( #73,795 of 72,573 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #67,371 of 72,573 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.