Natural Experiments and Pluralism in Political Science

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (4-5):424-441 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Natural experiments are an increasingly popular research design in political science. This popularity raises a number of questions. First, what are natural experiments and why are they appealing? Second, what makes a good natural experiment? And finally, are natural experiments able to provide resources for knowledge production that other methodologies cannot or do not provide? Using Mary Morgan’s and Thad Dunning’s recent work on natural experiments, I offer answers to the first two questions and use the analysis to argue that natural experiments highlight features of knowledge production that support methodological pluralism and the multiple aims of research
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CRANEA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Theory of Evidence for Evidence-Based Policy.Cartwright, Nancy & Stegenga, Jacob

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-15

Total views
144 ( #18,025 of 39,034 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #18,469 of 39,034 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.