Philosophy, Logic, Science, History

Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):20-37 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Analytic philosophy is sometimes said to have particularly close connections to logic and to science, and no particularly interesting or close relation to its own history. It is argued here that although the connections to logic and science have been important in the development of analytic philosophy, these connections do not come close to characterizing the nature of analytic philosophy, either as a body of doctrines or as a philosophical method. We will do better to understand analytic philosophy—and its relationship to continental philosophy—if we see it as a historically constructed collection of texts, which define its key problems and concerns. It is true, however, that analytic philosophy has paid little attention to the history of the subject. This is both its strength—since it allows for a distinctive kind of creativity—and its weakness—since ignoring history can encourage a philosophical variety of “normal science.”
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CRAPLS
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Objectivity.Wright, Crispin
Truth.Horwich, Paul
Truth.Horwich, Paul

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-01-06

Total views
83 ( #25,653 of 39,689 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #35,166 of 39,689 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.