"Hume Variations" by Jerry A. Fodor [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Contemporary philosophy has had a difficult relationship with its own history. One extreme view conceives of the task of philosophy purely in terms of solving certain given problems, and considers the history of philosophy to have no more relevance to this project than the history of physics has to physics itself. Certainly the history of philosophy is an important intellectual discipline, they argue, but just as physicists do not need to read Newton’s Principia in order to make progress, philosophers do not need to read Aristotle or Kant. At the other extreme are the sceptics who believe that creative philosophy is, for some reason or another it is no longer possible, and that all that can be done is to provide ‘readings’ of the great thinkers of the past. As the late Burton Dreben is supposed to have remarked: ‘junk is junk, but the history of junk is scholarship’.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CRARHV
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-09-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-09-26

Total views
214 ( #30,532 of 65,522 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #51,718 of 65,522 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.