Adam Smith. Skeptical Newtonianism, Disenchanted Republicanism, and the Birth of Social Science

In Marcelo Dascal & Ora Gruengrad (eds.), Knowledge and Politics: Case Studies on the Relationship between Epistemology and Political Philosophy. Boulder, Co, USA: Westview Press. pp. 83-110 (1989)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Both Adam Smith's epistemology and his politics head to a stalemate. The former is under the opposing pulls of an essentialist ideal of knowledge and of a pragmatist approach to the history of science. The latter still tries to provide a foundation for a natural law, while conceiving it as non-absolute and changeable. The consequences are (i) inability to complete both the political and the epistemological works projected by Smith; (ii) decentralization of the social order, giving rise to several partial orders, such as that of the market.
Reprint years
1989
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CREASS-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-05-01
Latest version: 2 (2020-05-05)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-01-28

Total views
228 ( #28,234 of 64,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #33,417 of 64,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.