On What it Takes to be an Expert

Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):1-21 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper tackles the problem of defining what a cognitive expert is. Starting from a shared intuition that the definition of an expert depends upon the conceptual function of expertise, I shed light on two main approaches to the notion of an expert: according to novice-oriented accounts of expertise, experts need to provide laypeople with information they lack in some domain; whereas, according to research-oriented accounts, experts need to contribute to the epistemic progress of their discipline. In this paper, I defend the thesis that cognitive experts should be identified by their ability to perform the latter function rather than the former, as novice-oriented accounts, unlike research-oriented ones, fail to comply with the rules of a functionalist approach to expertise.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Can Testimony Generate Understanding?Malfatti, Federica Isabella
How To Be Rational.Robert, David

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
287 ( #11,282 of 41,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #11,063 of 41,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.