Teorie dei vizi. Un'analisi critica

Ethics and Politics 22 (1):577-598 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper offers a critical analysis of the current debate in vice theory. Its main aim is to provide the reader with the conceptual and methodological tools to navigate the discussion among reliabilist, responsibilist, and obstructivist approaches to moral and epistemic vices. After a brief exploration of the reasons underlying the recent flourishing of vice theories (§2), the responsibilist account is introduced (§3) and several critical remarks are offered to ensure that this view can accommodate the cases of malevolent and indifferent individuals (§4). The two following sections are devoted to a critical discussion of vice-reliabilism (§5) and Quassim Cassam’s obstructivism (§6). The conclusive section (§7) provides reasons to favor vice-responsibilism over vice-reliabilism and Heather Battaly’s pluralist approach, and sheds light on the innovative features of an obstructivist reading.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-04-04
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
162 ( #39,751 of 69,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #13,843 of 69,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.