A Simple Tool for Disincentivizing the Worst Pandemic Bioweapons

In Nathan A. Paxton, Disincentivising Bioweapons. Nuclear Threat Initiative. pp. 167-178 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay proposes a simple way to incentivize states not to develop pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential (PEPPs) as bioweapons: to tip all state actors that all of them stand to lose from developing such highly lethal, highly transmissible bioweapons. Being highly transmissible, a PEPP used as a weapon could easily spread, infecting a state’s own citizens and leaders. Therefore, no state concerned for its own citizens or leaders can afford to use a PEPP weapon, even having developed or acquired it. We then show that when this is commonly known between states, having PEPPs provides no useful deterrent to a state, and there is no point getting into an arms race. Developing and stockpiling PEPP weapons gives states no gain, only risk. We end by assessing three objections to our thesis.

Author Profiles

Nir Eyal
Harvard University
Emma J. Curran
University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-15

Downloads
187 (#96,069)

6 months
187 (#22,212)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?