Semantic Epistemology Redux: Proof and Validity in Quantum Mechanics

Logos and Episteme 7 (3):287-303 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Definitions I presented in a previous article as part of a semantic approach in epistemology assumed that the concept of derivability from standard logic held across all mathematical and scientific disciplines. The present article argues that this assumption is not true for quantum mechanics (QM) by showing that concepts of validity applicable to proofs in mathematics and in classical mechanics are inapplicable to proofs in QM. Because semantic epistemology must include this important theory, revision is necessary. The one I propose also extends semantic epistemology beyond the ‘hard’ sciences. The article ends by presenting and then refuting some responses QM theorists might make to my arguments.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-08

Downloads
421 (#54,424)

6 months
89 (#63,840)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?