Research participants’ perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis

BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):60 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Appropriate information and consent has been one of the most intensely discussed topics within the context of biobank research. In parallel to the normative debate, many socio-empirical studies have been conducted to gather experiences, preferences and views of patients, healthy research participants and further stakeholders. However, there is scarcity of literature which connects the normative debate about justifications for different consent models with findings gained in empirical research. In this paper we discuss findings of a limited review of socio-empirical research on patients’ and healthy research participants’ experiences and views regarding consent to biobank research in light of ethical principles for appropriate information and consent
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DABRPP
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-09-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-09-09

Total views
176 ( #28,381 of 57,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #46,428 of 57,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.