Is ontological revisionism uncharitable?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):405-425 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Some philosophers deny the existence of composite material objects. Other philosophers hold that whenever there are some things, they compose something. The purpose of this paper is to scrutinize an objection to these revisionary views: the objection that nihilism and universalism are both unacceptably uncharitable because each of them implies that a great deal of what we ordinarily believe is false. Our main business is to show how nihilism and universalism can be defended against the objection. A secondary point is that universalism is harder to defend than nihilism.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-11-22
Latest version: 2 (2016-05-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Parthood.Sider, Theodore

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
536 ( #4,262 of 39,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #14,564 of 39,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.