Berkeley's Rejection of Divine Analogy

Science Et Esprit 63 (2):149-161 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Berkeley argues that claims about divine predication (e.g., God is wise or exists) should be understood literally rather than analogically, because like all spirits (i.e., causes), God is intelligible only in terms of the extent of his effects. By focusing on the harmony and order of nature, Berkeley thus unites his view of God with his doctrines of mind, force, grace, and power, and avoids challenges to religious claims that are raised by appeals to analogy. The essay concludes by showing how a letter, supposedly by Berkeley, to Peter Browne ("discovered" in 1969 by Berman and Pittion) is, in fact, by John Jackson (1686-1763), controversial theologian and friend of Samuel Clarke.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DANBRO-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-06-17
Latest version: 4 (2017-02-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-08-20

Total views
173 ( #16,313 of 39,588 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #25,409 of 39,588 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.