Berkeley, Suárez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
For Berkeley, a thing's existence 'esse' is nothing more than its being perceived 'as that thing'. It makes no sense to ask (with Samuel Johnson) about the 'esse' of the mind or the specific act of perception, for that would be like asking what it means for existence to exist. Berkeley's "existere is percipi or percipere" (NB 429) thus carefully adopts the scholastic distinction between 'esse' and 'existere' ignored by Locke and others committed to a substantialist notion of mind. Following the Stoics, Berkeley proposes that, 'as' the existence of ideas, minds "subsist" rather than "exist" and, accordingly, cannot be identified as independently existing things.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DANBSA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-07-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
94 ( #24,100 of 39,608 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #32,709 of 39,608 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.