In Defence of the Hivemind Society

Neuroethics 14 (2):253-267 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The idea that humans should abandon their individuality and use technology to bind themselves together into hivemind societies seems both farfetched and frightening – something that is redolent of the worst dystopias from science fiction. In this article, we argue that these common reactions to the ideal of a hivemind society are mistaken. The idea that humans could form hiveminds is sufficiently plausible for its axiological consequences to be taken seriously. Furthermore, far from being a dystopian nightmare, the hivemind society could be desirable and could enable a form of sentient flourishing. Consequently, we should not be so quick to deny it. We provide two arguments in support of this claim – the axiological openness argument and the desirability argument – and then defend it against three major objections.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DANIDO-10
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-09-16

Total views
1,396 ( #3,025 of 64,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
206 ( #2,375 of 64,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.