In Defence of the Hivemind Society

Neuroethics 14 (2):253-267 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea that humans should abandon their individuality and use technology to bind themselves together into hivemind societies seems both farfetched and frightening – something that is redolent of the worst dystopias from science fiction. In this article, we argue that these common reactions to the ideal of a hivemind society are mistaken. The idea that humans could form hiveminds is sufficiently plausible for its axiological consequences to be taken seriously. Furthermore, far from being a dystopian nightmare, the hivemind society could be desirable and could enable a form of sentient flourishing. Consequently, we should not be so quick to deny it. We provide two arguments in support of this claim – the axiological openness argument and the desirability argument – and then defend it against three major objections.

Author Profiles

John Danaher
University College, Galway
Steve Petersen
Niagara University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-16

Downloads
3,590 (#2,019)

6 months
483 (#2,599)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?