Stoicism in Berkeley's Philosophy

In Bertil Belfrage & Timo Airaksinen (eds.), Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 121-34 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Commentators have not said much regarding Berkeley and Stoicism. Even when they do, they generally limit their remarks to Berkeley’s Siris (1744) where he invokes characteristically Stoic themes about the World Soul, “seminal reasons,” and the animating fire of the universe. The Stoic heritage of other Berkeleian doctrines (e.g., about mind or the semiotic character of nature) is seldom recognized, and when it is, little is made of it in explaining his other doctrines (e.g., immaterialism). None of this is surprising, considering how Stoics are considered arch-materialists and determinists. My aim is to suggest that our understanding of Berkeley’s philosophy is improved significantly by acknowledging its underlying Stoic character. I argue that Berkeley proposes not only a semantic ontology based on assumptions of Stoic logic but also a doctrine in which perceptions or ideas are intelligible precisely because they are always embedded in the propositions of a discourse or language.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Development of Logic.Kneale, William & Kneale, Martha
The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy.Algra, Keimpe; Barnes, Jonathan; Mansfeld, Jaap & Schofield, Malcolm (eds.)
Logic.Bobzien, Susanne
Stoic Logic.Mates, Benson

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
193 ( #22,308 of 50,520 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,365 of 50,520 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.