A Puzzle About Knowledge, Blame, and Coherence

Acta Analytica 34 (4):493-503 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers have offered arguments in favor of the following three theses: A is epistemically permitted to believe P only if A is in a position to know that P, incoherent agents fail to satisfy the aforementioned knowledge norm of belief, and A’s apparent reasons are relevant to determining what A is blameworthy for believing. In this paper, I argue that the above three theses are jointly inconsistent. The main upshot of the paper is this: even if the knowledge norm of belief is correct, it cannot explain some deontic requirements governing belief.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAOAPA
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-03-19
Latest version: 2 (2019-03-22)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Accuracy, Coherence, and Evidence.Fitelson, Branden & Easwaran, Kenny

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-03-19

Total views
58 ( #34,425 of 43,787 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #24,488 of 43,787 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.