Fair Innings and Time-Relative Claims

Bioethics 30 (6):462-468 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Greg Bognar has recently offered a prioritarian justification for ‘fair innings’ distributive principles that would ration access to healthcare on the basis of patients' age. In this article, I agree that Bognar's principle is among the strongest arguments for age-based rationing. However, I argue that this position is incomplete because of the possibility of ‘time-relative' egalitarian principles that could complement the kind of lifetime egalitarianism that Bognar adopts. After outlining Bognar's position, and explaining the attraction of time-relative egalitarianism, I suggest various ways in which these two kinds of principle could interact. Since various options have very different implications for age-based rationing, proponents of such a rationing scheme must take a position on time-relative egalitarianism to complement a lifetime prioritarian view like Bognar's.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVFIA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-07-12
Latest version: 2 (2018-07-12)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-12-10

Total views
54 ( #42,128 of 51,672 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #38,589 of 51,672 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.