Infallibilism and Easy Counter-Examples

Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (4):475-499 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Infallibilism is commonly rejected because it is apparently subject to easy counter-examples. I describe a strategy that infallibilists can use to resist this objection. Because the sentences used in the counter-examples to express evidence and belief are context-sensitive, the infallibilist can insist that such counter-examples trade on a vacillation between different readings of these sentences. I describe what difficulties await those who try to produce counter-examples against which the proposed strategy is ineffective.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-08-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
221 ( #20,210 of 51,398 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #13,444 of 51,398 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.