Oppy and Modal Theistic Proofs

Philosophia Christi 11 (2):437-444 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that Graham Oppy’s attempt to redefend his charge that all modal theistic arguments “must be question-begging” is unsuccessful. Oppy’s attempt to show that theism and modal concretism are compatible is not only tangential for his purposes, it is marred by a misunderstanding of theism, and vulnerable to a counterexample that actually demonstrates incompatibility. Moreover, the notion of begging the question employed by Oppy against the theist is seen to be far too permissive.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-07-24
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #34,389 of 53,010 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #23,892 of 53,010 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.