On Jesus, Derrida, and Dawkins: Rejoinder to Joshua Harris

Philosophia Christi 16 (1):185-191 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper we respond to three objections raised by Joshua Harris to our article, “Against a Postmodern Pentecostal Epistemology,” in which we express misgivings about the conjunction of Pentecostalism with James K. A. Smith’s postmodern, story-based epistemolo- gy. According to Harris, our critique: 1) problematically assumes a correspondence theory of truth, 2) invalidly concludes that “Derrida’s Axiom” conflicts with “Peter’s Axiom,” and 3) fails to consider an alternative account of the universality of Christian truth claims. We argue that Harris’s objections either demonstrate a deficient interpretation of the relevant biblical pas- sages or are not directed at us at all.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-02-14
Latest version: 2 (2019-07-20)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against a Postmodern Pentecostal Epistemology.Davis, Richard Brian & Franks, W. Paul
Who’s Truth?Harris, Joshua Lee

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #36,145 of 47,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #33,335 of 47,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.