Etiological challenges to religious practices

American Philosophical Quarterly 55 (4):329–340 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a common assumption that evolutionary explanations of religion undermine religious beliefs. Do etiological accounts similarly affect the rationality of religious practices? To answer this question, this paper looks at two influential evolutionary accounts of ritual, the hazard-precaution model and costly signaling theory. It examines whether Cuneo’s account of ritual knowledge as knowing to engage God can be maintained in the light of these evolutionary accounts. While the evolutionary accounts under consideration are not metaphysically incompatible with the idea that religious rituals engage God, they cast doubt on whether many, if not all, rituals can do this successfully.

Author's Profile

Helen De Cruz
Saint Louis University

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-05

Downloads
799 (#24,682)

6 months
123 (#39,164)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?