Religious disagreement: An empirical study among academic philosophers

Episteme 14 (1) (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Religious disagreement is an emerging topic of interest in social epistemology. Little is known about how philosophers react to religious disagreements in a professional context, or how they think one should respond to disagreement. This paper presents results of an empirical study on religious disagreement among philosophers. Results indicate that personal religious beliefs, philosophical training, and recent changes in religious outlook have a significant impact on philosophers' assessments of religious disagreement. They regard peer disagreement about religion as common, and most surveyed participants assume one should accord weight to the other's opinion. Theists and agnostics are less likely to assume they are in a better epistemic position than their interlocutors about religious questions compared with atheists, but this pattern only holds for participants who are not philosophers of religion. Continental philosophers think religious beliefs are more like preferences than analytic philosophers, who regard religious beliefs as fact-like.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DECRDA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Disagreement.Matheson, Jonathan & Frances, Bryan

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-11-20

Total views
544 ( #4,703 of 40,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
121 ( #3,469 of 40,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.