Truth, Inquiry and Democratic Authority in the Climate Debate

Public Affairs Quarterly 28 (4):375-394 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent attempts to legislate climate science out of existence raises the question of whether citizens are obliged to obey such laws. The authority of democratic law is rooted in both truth and popular consent, but neither is sufficient and they may conflict. These are reconciled in theory and, more importantly, in practice once we incorporate insights from the pragmatist theory of inquiry.

Author's Profile

Phillip Deen
University of New Hampshire, Manchester

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-11

Downloads
230 (#80,806)

6 months
51 (#92,021)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?