Deductive Cogency, understanding, and acceptance

Synthese 195 (7):3121-3141 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Deductive Cogency holds that the set of propositions towards which one has, or is prepared to have, a given type of propositional attitude should be consistent and closed under logical consequence. While there are many propositional attitudes that are not subject to this requirement, e.g. hoping and imagining, it is at least prima facie plausible that Deductive Cogency applies to the doxastic attitude involved in propositional knowledge, viz. belief. However, this thought is undermined by the well-known preface paradox, leading a number of philosophers to conclude that Deductive Cogency has at best a very limited role to play in our epistemic lives. I argue here that Deductive Cogency is still an important epistemic requirement, albeit not as a requirement on belief. Instead, building on a distinction between belief and acceptance introduced by Jonathan Cohen and recent developments in the epistemology of understanding, I propose that Deductive Cogency applies to the attitude of treating propositions as given in the context of attempting to understand a given phenomenon. I then argue that this simultaneously accounts for the plausibility of the considerations in favor of Deductive Cogency and avoids the problematic consequences of the preface paradox.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DELDCU
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Extended Mind.Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David J.
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.
The Scientific Image.Van Fraassen, Bas C.

View all 79 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-06

Total views
118 ( #25,930 of 44,323 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #23,775 of 44,323 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.