Understanding without Justification or Belief

Ratio 30 (3):239-254 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest among epistemologists in the nature of understanding, with some authors arguing that understanding should replace knowledge as the primary focus of epistemology. But what is understanding? According to what is often called the standard view, understanding is a species of knowledge. Although this view has recently been challenged in various ways, even the critics of the standard view have assumed that understanding requires justification and belief. I argue that it requires neither. If sound, these arguments have important upshots not only for the nature of understanding, but also for its distinctive epistemic value and its role in contemporary epistemology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DELUWJ
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Scientific Image.Van Fraassen, Bas C.
Understanding Why.Hills, Alison

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-02-18

Total views
442 ( #6,867 of 42,371 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
77 ( #7,103 of 42,371 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.