Good Fit versus Meaning in Life

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Meaning in life is too important not to study systematically, but doing so is made difficult by conceptual indeterminacy. An approach to meaning that is promising but, indeed, conceptually vague is Jonathan Haidt’s ‘cross-level coherence’ account. In order to remove the vagueness, I propose a concept of ‘good fit’ that a) captures central aspects of meaning as it is discussed in the literature; b) brings the subject of meaning under the survey of the dynamicist or ‘embodied-embedded’ philosophy of cognition; and c) allows the theoretical discussion on meaning to become more focused and systematic. The article addresses two apparent problems with the idea of ‘good fit,’ namely the fact that both challenges and relations of an agent with the outside world are central to meaning. It is finally pointed out which implications adopting the concept of ‘good fit’ instead of ‘meaning’ would have.
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Quine, Willard V. O.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
95 ( #26,709 of 42,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #17,578 of 42,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.