Virgin vs. Chad: On Enforced Monogamy as a Solution to the Incel Problem

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Controversially, psychologist and public intellectual Jordan Peterson advises “enforced monogamy” for societies with high percentages of “incels.” As Peterson’s proposal resonates in manosphere circles, this chapter reconstructs and briefly evaluates the argument for it. Premised on the moral importance of civilizational sustainability, advocates argue that both polygamous and socially monogamous but sexually liberal mating patterns result in unsustainable proportions of unattached young men. Given the premises, monogamous societies are probably justified in maintaining their anti-polygamist social and legal norms. The case for imposing stricter sexual norms on socially monogamous but sexually liberal societies is weaker, however, as male involuntary celibacy in those places isn’t as directly caused by male intrasexual competition, and since less intrusive social interventions are more likely to ameliorate “the incel problem.”
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEMVVC
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-11-29
Latest version: 3 (2020-12-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-11-29

Total views
541 ( #9,493 of 58,198 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
541 ( #565 of 58,198 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.