Methodology and policy prescription in economic thought: A response to Mario Bunge

Journal of Socio-Economics 32 (2):219-226 (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Bunge (2000) distinguishes two main methodological approaches of holism and individualism, and associates with them policy prescriptions of centralism and laissez-faire. He identifies systemism as a superior approach to both the study and management of society. The present paper, seeking to correct and develop this line of thought, suggests a more complex relation between policy and methodology. There are two possible methodological underpinnings for laissez-faire: while writers such as Friedman and Lucas fit Bunge’s pattern, more sophisticated advocates of laissez-faire, such as Smith and Hayek, base their policy prescription in a methodology quite divergent from the individualism Bunge describes.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DENMAP
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
108 ( #22,863 of 39,912 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #16,605 of 39,912 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.