Whatever Happened to Evans' Action Component?

Philosophy 92 (3):449-470 (July 2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A long line of writers on Evans – Andy Hamilton, Lucy O'Brien, Jose Bermudez, and Jason Stanley, to name just a few – assess Evans' account of first-person thought without heeding his warnings that his theory comprises an information and an action component. By omitting the action component, these critics are able to characterize Evans' theory as a perceptual model theory and reject it on that ground. This paper is an attempt to restore the forgotten element. With this component put back in, the charge of Evans' theory as a perceptual model of such thoughts falls apart, and the theory turns out to have enough merit to project itself as a legitimate contender for a plausible account of 'I'-thought.
Reprint years
2017, July 2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-12-15
Latest version: 2 (2018-02-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Varieties of Reference.Antony, Louise M.; Evans, Gareth & McDowell, John
Collected Papers.McGinn, Colin & Evans, Gareth
The First Person.Anscombe, G. E. M.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #23,248 of 42,959 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #12,097 of 42,959 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.