The Reception of Positivism in Whewell, Mill and Brentano

In Ion Tanasescu, Alexandru Bejinariu, Susan Krantz Gabriel & Constantin Stoenescu (eds.), Brentano and the Positive Philosophy of Comte and Mill. Berlin, Allemagne: De Gruyter (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article compares and contrasts the reception of Comte’s positivism in the works of William Whewell, John Stuart Mill and Franz Brentano. It is argued that Whewell’s rejection of positivism derives from his endorsement of a constructivist account of the inductive sciences, while Mill and Brentano’s sympathies for positivism are connected to their endorsement of an empiricist account. The mandate of the article is to spell out the chief differences between these two rival accounts. In the last, conclusive section, Whewell’s anti-positivist argument is briefly assessed, and rebutted.
Reprint years
9999
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEWTRO-19
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-03-06
Latest version: 3 (2021-01-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-03-06

Total views
104 ( #41,693 of 2,438,960 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #28,627 of 2,438,960 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.