A Note on Plural Logic

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A distinction is introduced between itemized and non-itemized plural predication. It is argued that a full-fledged system of plural logic is not necessary in order to account for the validity of inferences concerning itemized collective predication. Instead, it is shown how this type of inferences can be adequately dealt with in a first-order logic system, after small modifications on the standard treatment. The proposed system, unlike plural logic, has the advantage of preserving completeness. And as a result, inferences such as ‘Dick and Tony emptied the bottle, hence Tony and Dick emptied the bottle’ are shown to be first-order
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEZANO
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Plural Predication.McKay, Thomas
Beyond Plurals.Rayo, Agustin

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Composition and Identities.Lechthaler, Manuel

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-12-19

Total views
84 ( #33,815 of 47,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #41,447 of 47,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.