Disagreeing over evaluatives: Preference, normative and moral discourse

Manuscrito 38 (2):39-63 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives –mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIADOE
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-04-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-12-02

Total views
81 ( #41,446 of 55,913 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #32,889 of 55,913 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.