Risk and Luck in Medical Ethics

Polity (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This book examines the moral luck paradox, relating it to Kantian, consequentialist and virtue-based approaches to ethics. It also applies the paradox to areas in medical ethics, including allocation of scarce medical resources, informed consent to treatment, withholding life-sustaining treatment, psychiatry, reproductive ethics, genetic testing and medical research. If risk and luck are taken seriously, it might seem to follow that we cannot develop any definite moral standards, that we are doomed to moral relativism. However, Dickenson offers strong counter-arguments to this view that enable us to think in terms of universal standards.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-06-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Luck and Business Ethics.Michaelson, Christopher
Models for Humanitarian Health Care Ethics.Schwartz, L.; Hunt, M.; Sinding, C.; Elit, L.; Redwood-Campbell, L.; Adelson, N. & de Laat, S.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
75 ( #37,445 of 50,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #21,293 of 50,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.