Analogy and Conceptual Change, or You can't step into the same mind twice

In Eric Dietrich Art Markman (ed.), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 265--294 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Sometimes analogy researchers talk as if the freshness of an experience of analogy resides solely in seeing that something is like something else -- seeing that the atom is like a solar system, that heat is like flowing water, that paint brushes work like pumps, or that electricity is like a teeming crowd. But analogy is more than this. Analogy isn't just seeing that the atom is like a solar system; rather, it is seeing something new about the atom, an observation enabled by 'looking' at atoms from the perspective of one's understanding of solar systems. The question for analogy researchers then is this: Where does this new knowledge about atoms come from? How can an analogy provide new knowledge and new understanding?
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIEAAC
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-02-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction.Holyoak, Keith J. & Thagard, Paul
MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity‐Based Retrieval.Forbus, Kenneth D.; Gentner, Dedre & Law, Keith
Science and Method.Poincaré, Henri

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
984 ( #1,922 of 40,630 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #13,933 of 40,630 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.