AI, Situatedness, Creativity, and Intelligence; or the Evolution of the Little Hearing Bones

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Good sciences have good metaphors. Indeed, good sciences are good because they have good metaphors. AI could use more good metaphors. In this editorial, I would like to propose a new metaphor to help us understand intelligence. Of course, whether the metaphor is any good or not depends on whether it actually does help us. (What I am going to propose is not something opposed to computationalism -- the hypothesis that cognition is computation. Noncomputational metaphors are in vogue these days, and to date they have all been equally plausible and equally successful. And, just to be explicit, I do not mean “IQ” by “intelligence.” I am using “intelligence” in the way AI uses it: as a semi-techical term referring to a general property of all intelligent systems, animal (including humans), or machine, alike.).
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIEASC
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-02-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
391 ( #17,163 of 64,251 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #19,046 of 64,251 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.