Being Perfect is Not Necessary for Being God

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Classic perfect being theologians take ‘being perfect’ to be conceptually necessary and sufficient for being God. I argue that this claim is false because being perfect is not conceptually necessary for being God. I rest my case on a simple thought experiment inspired by an alternative I developed to perfect being theology that I call “functional theology.” My findings, if correct, are a boon for theists since if it should turn out that there is no perfect being, there could still be a God.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is Functionalism?Ned Block - 1996 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), [Book Chapter]. MacMillan.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #34,570 of 40,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #15,620 of 40,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.