Quasi-Realism and Inductive Scepticism in Hume’s Theory of Causation

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):637-650 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Interpreters of Hume on causation consider that an advantage of the ‘quasi-realist’ reading is that it does not commit him to scepticism or to an error theory about causal reasoning. It is unique to quasi-realism that it maintains this positive epistemic result together with a rejection of metaphysical realism about causation: the quasi-realist supplies an appropriate semantic theory in order to justify the practice of talking ‘as if’ there were causal powers in the world. In this paper, I problematise the quasi-realist reading of Hume on causation by showing how quasi-realism does not speak to inductive scepticism. I also offer evidence that Hume takes inductive scepticism to result from his theory of causation, and that his scepticism is tied to his rejection of metaphysical causal realism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-12
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
179 ( #31,962 of 2,446,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #29,151 of 2,446,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.