‘Blind’ to the obvious

History of the Human Sciences 27 (4):59-76 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein cites the Gestalt psychologist Wolfgang Koehler almost as often as he cites William James in his posthumously published writings on the philosophy of psychology. Yet, few treatments of the Wittgenstein–Koehler relation in the philosophical literature could be called sustained discussions. Moreover, most of them treat Koehler as a mere whipping boy for Wittgenstein, one more opportunity to criticize the practice of psychologists. This article emphasizes how much the two thinkers agreed, and the extent to which some of Wittgenstein’s work not only agreed with but also has a logical structure parallel to some of Koehler’s text. Both thinkers hold that the theoretician should strive to recognize and resist the impulse to step in and purify, distill, streamline, or exclude phenomena: common, everyday experience for Koehler and common, everyday uses of words for Wittgenstein. They both aim to counteract the tendency to discount and disparage what is ordinary and common.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DINBTT
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Zettel.Llewelyn, J. E.
Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology.Diamond, Cora; Wittgenstein, Ludwig; Anscombe, G. E. M.; von Wright, G. H.; Nyman, Heikki; Luckhardt, C. G. & Aue, M. A. E.
Culture and Value.Wittgenstein, Ludwig; Von Wright, G. H.; Nymam, Heikki & Winch, Peter

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-05-17

Total views
218 ( #19,649 of 49,054 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #32,414 of 49,054 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.