Sexual Rights and Disability

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (3):158-161 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I argue against Appel's recent proposal – in this JOURNAL – that there is a fundamental human right to sexual pleasure, and that therefore the sexual pleasure of severely disabled people should be publicly funded – by thereby partially legalizing prostitution. I propose an alternative that does not need to pose a new positive human right; does not need public funding; does not need the legalization of prostitution; and that would offer a better experience to the severely disabled: charitable non-profit organizations whose members would voluntarily and freely provide sexual pleasure to the severely disabled

Author's Profile

Ezio Di Nucci
University of Copenhagen


Added to PP

2,191 (#2,907)

6 months
110 (#17,566)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?