Withdrawing artificial nutrition and patients' interests

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the arguments brought by Counsel for M to the English Court of Protection are morally problematic in prioritising subjective interests that are the result of ‘consistent autonomous thought’ over subjective interests that are the result of a more limited cognitive perspective

Author's Profile

Ezio Di Nucci
University of Copenhagen

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-01

Downloads
886 (#19,421)

6 months
119 (#50,452)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?