Withdrawing artificial nutrition and patients' interests

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that the arguments brought by Counsel for M to the English Court of Protection are morally problematic in prioritising subjective interests that are the result of ‘consistent autonomous thought’ over subjective interests that are the result of a more limited cognitive perspective
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DINWAN
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-09-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-09-01

Total views
497 ( #12,937 of 64,194 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #16,034 of 64,194 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.