Withdrawing artificial nutrition and patients' interests

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that the arguments brought by Counsel for M to the English Court of Protection are morally problematic in prioritising subjective interests that are the result of ‘consistent autonomous thought’ over subjective interests that are the result of a more limited cognitive perspective
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DINWAN
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-09-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Animal Liberation.Singer, Peter. (ed.)
Utilitarianism.Mill, John Stuart

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-09-01

Total views
405 ( #10,666 of 50,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #19,098 of 50,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.