Speaks's Reduction of Propositions to Properties: A Benacerraf Problem

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):275-284 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Speaks defends the view that propositions are properties: for example, the proposition that grass is green is the property being such that grass is green. We argue that there is no reason to prefer Speaks's theory to analogous but competing theories that identify propositions with, say, 2-adic relations. This style of argument has recently been deployed by many, including Moore and King, against the view that propositions are n-tuples, and by Caplan and Tillman against King's view that propositions are facts of a special sort. We offer our argument as an objection to the view that propositions are unsaturated relations.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIXSRO
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.Quine, Willard Van Orman
New Thinking About Propositions.King, Jeffrey C.; Soames, Scott & Speaks, Jeff

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-09-21

Total views
260 ( #13,748 of 43,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #8,832 of 43,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.